Wednesday, May 25, 2011

Gnome Balcony


We're delighted to announce the publication of a new poetry chapbook by Ross Kightly*, entitled Gnome Balcony from HappenStance Press, and recommended for your core poetry collections, obviously now incomplete without. Available here.

More at www.happenstance.co.uk

*Full disclosure - father of the v. proud James

Monday, February 7, 2011

Sincerity may not Flatter - Duke & Thompson...


If you were the drug-taking inventor of Gonzo Journalism, you'd think it would be hard to feel insuted by anything except being charecterised as an upstanding, sober WASP, but Hunter S. Thompson was insulted by an accurate 'portrait', saying:
"some people grow up and want to be firemen, and some want to be president; nobody wants to grow up and be a cartoon character"
That was in answer to being questioned on the fact that Doonesbury cartoon character 'Uncle Duke' was initially based on Gonzo journalist Hunter S. Thompson's pseudonymous self-portrait, Raoul Duke.

_________

'Uncle Duke'
"Uncle" of Zonker, former Rolling Stone writer, governor of American Samoa and ambassador to China, once the proconsul of Panama, former owner of "Club Scud" in Kuwait City, ex-orphanage manager (where he realized one of the orphans, Earl, was his son), and former mayor of the fictional Al Amok, Iraq. He has also been a drug smuggler (and heavy user), an enemy of John Denver, manager of the Washington Redskins, toady to Donald Trump, and a zombie slave to ex-Haitian President Jean-Claude Duvalier.

Hunter S Thopmson
Hunter Stockton Thompson (July 18, 1937 – February 20, 2005) was an American journalist and author who wrote Fear and Loathing in Las Vegas (1971) and Fear and Loathing on the Campaign Trail '72 (1973).

He is credited as the creator of Gonzo journalism, a style of reporting where reporters involve themselves in the action to such a degree that they become central figures of their stories. He is known also for his unrepentant lifelong use of alcohol, LSD, marijuana, and cocaine (among other substances); his love of firearms; his long-standing hatred of Richard Nixon; and his iconoclastic contempt for authoritarianism. While suffering a bout of health problems, he committed suicide in 2005, at the age of 67.

_________

It's hard to surprise when you spend your whole life 'out there' like Hunter S did, but I reckon the above quote is pretty odd, however you cut it. More typical of the man is:
“I hate to advocate weird chemicals, alcohol, violence or insanity to anyone . . . but they’ve always worked for me.”
We need more writers like that.

Friday, January 21, 2011

A Detective's Oxford Rail Experience

I have long been a fan of Edmund Crispin, the writer of Oxford's other detective's stories. Last year there was one of those moments all to familiar to the collector when I finally laid hands on the last book in his oeuvre, a feeling of small success and reading anticipation rapidly overwhelmed by a tristesse that there was to be 'no more hunt'.


As well as writing delightfully excessive locked room mysteries, Crispin clearly loved nailing the foibles of the various 'sets' he dealt with in his professional, real, career as Bruce Montgomery, composer and film-score writer. In these areas he is acidly accurate, and the books are enjoyable for these summations of a time, place, people and profession. But, as many good whodunit writers also did, Crispin enjoyed making irrelevant seeming pen sketches, which at the most served to set an atmosphere, usually containing no clue to the mystery, but being at times some of the most enjoyable polemical writing of an almost Swiftian level. There are two I particularly enjoy among all the others; one on poets in heaven, which I may post another time, and the following item from the very beginning of his first book The Case of the Gilded Fly. It's what you get when you cross a Classical education with the essentials of a British railway journey. They're cleaner now, without steam engines and smoking carriages, and Oxford's station has been removed and replaced with a modern monstrosity, but the experience has so often simply not changed at all:

1. Prologue in Railway Trains

To the unwary traveller, Didcot signifies the imminence of his arrival at Oxford; to the more experienced, another half-hour at least of frustration. And travellers in general are divided into these two classes; the first apologetically haul down their luggage from the racks on to the seats, where it remains until the end of the journey, an encumbrance and a mass of sharp, unexpected edges; the second continue to stare gloomily out of the window at the waste of woods and fields into which, by some witless godling, the station bas been inexplicably dumped, and at the lines of goods trucks from ail parts of the country, assembled like the isle of lost ships of current myth, in the middle of a Sargasso Sea. A persistent accompaniment of dark muttering and shouting, together with a brisk tearing of wood and metal reminiscent of early Walpurgis Night in a local cemetery, suggest to the more imaginative of the passengers that the engine is being dismantled and put together again. The delay in Didcot station amounts as a rule to twenty minutes or more.

Then there are about three fausses sorties, involving a tremendous crashing and jolting of machinery which buffets the passengers into a state of abject submission. With infinite reluctance, the cortege gets on the move at last, carrying its unhappy cargo in an extremely leisurely manner through the flat landscape. There are quite a surprising number of wayside stations and halts before you arrive at Oxford, and it misses none of these, often lingering at them beyond all reason, since no one gets either in or out; but perhaps the guard has seen someone hurrying belatedly down the station road, or has observed a local inhabitant asleep in his corner and is reluctant to wake him; perhaps there is a cow on the line, or the signal is against us - investigation, however, proves that there is no cow, nor even any signal, pro or contra.

Towards Oxford matters become a little more cheerful. Within sight of the canal, say, or Tom Tower. An atmosphere of purposefulness begins to be felt; it requires the utmost strength of will to remain seated, and hatless, and coatless, with one's luggage still in the rack and one's ticket still in an inside pocket; and the more hopeful occupants are already clambering into the corridors. But sure enough, the train stops just outside the station, the monolithic apparitions of a gas-works on one side, a cemetery on the other, by which the engine lingers with ghoulish insistence, emitting sporadic shrieks and groans of necrophilous delight. A sense of wild, itching frustration sets in; there is Oxford, there, a few yards away, is the station, and here is the train, and passengers are not allowed to walk along the line, even if any of them had the initiative to do so; it is the whole torture of Tantalus in hell. This interlude of memento mori, during which the railway company reminds the golden lads and girls in its charge of their inevitable coming to dust, goes on usually for about ten minutes, after which the train proceeds grudgingly into that station so aptly called by Max Beerbohm 'the last relic of the Middle Ages'.

But if any traveller imagines that this is the end, he is mistaken. Upon arrival there, when even the most sceptical have begun to shift about, it is at once discovered that the train is not at a platform at all, but on one of the centre lines. On either side, waiting friends and relations, balked at the eleventh hour of their re-union, rush hither and thither waving and uttering little cries, or stand with glum, anxious faces trying to catch a glimpse of those they are supposed to be meeting. It is as if Charon's boat were to become inextricably marooned in the middle of the Styx, unable either to proceed towards the dead or to return to the living. Meanwhile, internal shudderings of seismic magnitude occur which throw the passengers and their luggage into impotent shouting heaps on the floors of the corridors. In a few moments, those on the station are surprised to see the train disappearing in the direction of Manchester, with a cloud of smoke and an evil smell. In due time it returns backwards, and, miraculously, the journey is over.
His crime thrillers aren't to all tastes, being knowing, ridiculously over-complex, arch and allusive, sometimes to the level of simple pretension (but often succeed in making the reader feel rather a literary and educated man of the world - when it works). I find them endlessly re-readable. After all you want to know what happens next, don't you?

James

Thursday, January 13, 2011

Marieke Hardy on acting vs writing

"I mean, you can sit in your living room and write, but you can't sit in your living room and act. Well, you can, but people start to call the authorities."
In The Age.

Wednesday, December 8, 2010

Audubon - How much for 'priceless'?


A copy of James Audubon's famous Birds Of America sold at Sotheby's for over £7 million. The new owner, Michael Tollemache, a London dealer, could be said to actually have more money than sense as he described the work as "priceless". It's not clear whether that statement was before or after handing over the cash of the price.

Some interesting quotes from the Wiki page on Audubon;

Colorists applied each color in assembly-line fashion (over fifty were hired for the work). The original edition was engraved in aquatint by Robert Havell, Jr. ... Known as the Double Elephant folio after its double elephant paper size, it is often regarded as the greatest picture book ever produced and the finest aquatint work.

He followed Birds of America with a sequel Ornithological Biographies. This was a collection of life histories of each species written with Scottish ornithologist William MacGillivray. The two books were printed separately to avoid a British law requiring copies of all publications with text to be deposited in Crown libraries, a huge financial burden for the self-published Audubon.
I suspect the British Library and fellow Crown libraries have copies now.

Apparently the cost of printing the Birds of America was US $115,640 (over US $2 million today, or £1.3 million). When the project stuttered during an enforced absence, he told the wary few (of his otherwise loyal) subscribers: "'The Birds of America' will then raise in value as much as they are now depreciated by certain fools and envious persons."

In the same Sotheby's sale a 1623 First Folio Shakespeare cost a buyer £1,497,250.

Monday, November 15, 2010

Historians

From Terry Pratchett's Jingo:

Lord Vetinari:
'Oh my dear Vimes, history changes all the time. It is constantly being re-examined and re-evaluated, otherwise how would we be able to keep historians occupied? We can't possibly allow people with their sort of minds to walk around with time on their hands.'

Sunday, November 14, 2010

Cooking an internet thief

I'd hope we are all aware of the problem of Intellectual Property (IP) theft on the internet, and that (sadly) numerous print magazines and book publishers and authors (who should know better) lift online material wholesale and without credit.

So draw up your editor's chair, uncap the red pen, adjust the eyeshade and refill the Chardonnay glass as I bring you a warming tale of an arrogant cookery magazine editor's demise through theft and hubris - as Conrad Black has found, a dangerous combination.
...writer Monica Gaudio, who was surprised to learn this week that the small culinary magazine Cooks Source had lifted her five-year-old story for medieval cookery blog Gode Cookery entitled "A Tale of Two Tarts" ...
Challenging the editor, Judith Griggs, with a reasonable request for adjustment, Griggs responded with a breathtakingly foolish reply I quote in full:
"Yes Monica, I have been doing this for 3 decades, having been an editor at The Voice, Housitonic Home and Connecticut Woman Magazine. I do know about copyright laws. It was 'my bad' indeed, and, as the magazine is put together in long sessions, tired eyes and minds somethings forget to do these things. But honestly Monica, the web is considered 'public domain' and you should be happy we just didn't 'lift' your whole article and put someone else's name on it! It happens a lot, clearly more than you are aware of, especially on college campuses, and the workplace. If you took offence and are unhappy, I am sorry, but you as a professional should know that the article we used written by you was in very bad need of editing, and is much better now than was originally. Now it will work well for your portfolio. For that reason, I have a bit of a difficult time with your requests for monetary gain, albeit for such a fine (and very wealthy!) institution. We put some time into rewrites, you should compensate me! I never charge young writers for advice or rewriting poorly written pieces, and have many who write for me... ALWAYS for free!"

Oops. To cut the long story short, after Gaudio crowdsourced the story, Cooks Source got a (legal) online hammering on their Facebook page - to the extent of moving to a new one (which, of course failed to stop the crowd's challenges. Griggs has been through a savage learning experience, as she recounts here.

The good news is that Griggs has made appropriate restitution to the author and apologised; the bad news is that what is a small magazine may fold from Griggs' overload due to the consequences of the problem. Some of the internet crowd found other (alleged) lifted articles and others contacted the magazine's advertisers with the result that some have withdrawn their advertising and others fight shy.

I was recently 'informed' that Intellectual Property was unprotected in the age of the internet, as bringing a legal case was too difficult and expensive against the potential award obtainable. (For the record, I don't think that's an accurate analysis, or true.) However this case clearly shows that an ignorance of copyright law and a lack of care (and inadequate internet savvy) are potentially lethal to publishers. Ignorance of the law is no defence, as we should all know; but it is not necessarily the process of law but online 'justice' that may render a - potentially disproportionate - correction.

Caveat emendator.

James

Thanks to 'Steve Crewdog' on WIX for drawing my attention to the story here, and to the linked online sources particularly Salon here and Gode Cookery.